![]() |
|||
« Belly Hair, Check; Sex Drive, Not So Much | Main | Our Bodies, Ourselves: Pregnancy and Birth Featured on NBC10 » April 22, 2008Mortality Inequality: Life Expectancy Declines for Some U.S. WomenThe Washington Post has a front-page story today that's a shocker: Lfe expectancy for some U.S. women is on the decline, and the data points to a growing inequality between the best-off and worst-off counties. Here's the rundown: In nearly 1,000 counties that together are home to about 12 percent of the nation's women, life expectancy is now shorter than it was in the early 1980s, according to a study published today. There was some decline noted for men, too, but the decline was smaller (affecting 4 percent of males) and limited to fewer areas of the country. According to researchers, higher HIV/AIDS and homicide deaths contributed substantially to the life expectancy decline for men, but this was not the case for women. The news comes from this study (PDF) published in PLoS Medicine, an open-access journal of the Public Library of Science. The study is based on mortality statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and population data from the U.S. Census, gathered for the years 1961-1999, the last year data was available from the NCHS. Overall, the average life expectancy nationwide increased during that period from 66.9 years to 74.1 years for men, and from 73.5 years to 79.6 years for women. (It's worthwhile noting, as this story does, that life expectancy is "not a direct measure of how long people live," but is "a prediction of how long the average person would live if the death rates at the time of his or her birth lasted a lifetime.") Between 1961 to 1983, life expectancy kept going up everywhere, mostly because the death rate from heart attacks kept going down due to better prevention and improvements in medicine. But then researchers noticed a change: By the early 1980s, however, the rapid gains were coming to an end. The low-hanging fruit on the tree of heart-attack prevention and treatment had been picked. Further strides tended to happen mostly in places where people were already healthy and long-lived. Precisely why these 1,000 counties are the most affected is something for further study. Christopher J.L. Murray, a physician and epidemiologist at the University of Washington who led the study, tells the Post that it "would be a reasonably obvious strategy" to target them for aggressive public health campaigns. Campaigns are a positive step, but I wonder whether this news will spark more than well-intentioned programs. Addressing health inequalities in poor communities means addressing everything from access to medical care to access to grocery stores stocked with fresh fruit and vegetables. It means providing real economic opportunity. Maybe the fact that the life expectancy decline is pretty much to the United States -- save for some African countries stricken by the AIDS epidemic, or Russia following collapse of the Soviet Union -- will make this country's shocking health disparities an issue in the presidential campaign, right up there with, say, flag pins. |
Welcome to Our Bodies, Our Blog, your daily dose of women's health news and analysis. Send tips to: BLOG SEARCH
Subscribe to this blog's feed [What is this?]
BLOGS WE LIKE
|
| Copyright © 2006, Boston Women's Health Book Collective, Inc. |