![]() |
|||
« With Allies Like This, Who Needs Enemas? | Main | The Cost of Maternity Care » June 19, 2007Fox and CBS Reject New Condom CommercialTrojan condoms has unveiled a new advertising campaign that both CBS and Fox networks have refused to air -- apparently because pregnancy prevention is not a good enough reason to promote condom use. Andrew Adam Newman writes in The New York Times: Both had accepted Trojan's previous campaign, which urged condom use because of the possibility that a partner might be H.I.V.-positive, perhaps unknowingly. A 2001 report about condom advertising by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation found that, "Some networks draw a strong line between messages about disease prevention -- which may be allowed -- and those about pregnancy prevention, which may be considered controversial for religious and moral reasons." While Fox and CBS are being criticized for their decision, the commercial itself is drawing mixed reviews. Vanessa at Feministing writes: So do I like the commercial? Not particularly, but I looked through the website of this new campaign Trojan is launching titled "Evolve," and it definitely sounds like one I'd be willing to support: they discuss the misinformation that abstinence-only programs put forth about the inefficacy of condoms, the fact that often ideology is often promoted over real information, and their intent to put forth the message that "sex isn't an unhealthy thing needs to be policed or demonized." And Tracy Clark-Flory writes at Broadsheet: I was first alerted to the ad by a press release this morning from Planned Parenthood calling for the networks to reconsider their decision to block the spot. I was shocked to find that there's plenty about the ad that actually offends my own sensibilities. For starters: The depiction of men as pigs. I can understand the idea behind it -- that men who do not respect their partners enough to protect them from pregnancy or disease are pigs. But filling an entire bar with the nastiest of male stereotypes implies that almost all men are pigs. I'm also not too hot about the underlying message that men are solely responsible for condom use. Ultimately, however, Clark-Flory concludes: "I have a hard time passionately defending the actual content of the ad -- but I have a much harder time defending the networks' reasons for blocking it." According to the NYT, the commercial will run on ABC, NBC and nine cable networks, including MTV, Comedy Central and Adult Swim, along with print ads in 11 magazines and promotions on seven websites. The Times also provides a bit of condom history and market data: The 87-year-old company placed its first ad in trade magazines for pharmacists in 1927, when druggists still kept condoms behind the counter. Though out in the aisles for decades, condoms are still purchased furtively: while the average time shopping for a home-pregnancy test is 2.5 minutes, the average condom buyer takes just 7 seconds, according to research by Trojan. "We call it a drive-by purchase," Mr. Daniels said. "People to this day are embarrassed." |
Welcome to Our Bodies, Our Blog, your daily dose of women's health news and analysis. Send tips to: BLOG SEARCH
Subscribe to this blog's feed [What is this?]
BLOGS WE LIKE
|
| Copyright © 2006, Boston Women's Health Book Collective, Inc. |
Comments
But of course the have no problem running puppy-upper ads (Cialis, Viagra, etc.)...
Posted by: Lucinda Marshall | August 23, 2007 05:17 PM
Funny that an endorsement of family planning is too scandalous to air, yet the promotion of alcohol consumption, for example, is not.
Posted by: Maggie | August 23, 2007 05:19 PM